Page Index Toggle Pages: 1 Print
Hot Topic (More than 10 Replies) Seen in March... (Read 5,445 times)
josephk
Platinum Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3,981
Location: Canada
Joined: 01. Apr 2002
Seen in March...
01. Apr 2007 at 19:12
Print Post  


(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

I thought this was an excellent movie. David Ladd is lovely and the story is very good. *8/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------

Brick (2005)

(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

I guess this one doesn't really count, because all the actors are over 15, but I'm including it because it features a lot of well known (at least among this community) former boy actors: Joseph Gordon-Levitt, Lukas Haas, Noah Fleiss and Matt O'Leary (pictured above).

Although the actors all did a pretty good job and it's nice to see so many talented young actors making a successful transition into adult acting, I have to say that unfortunately the movie itself was pretty lame. If anybody asked me for the definition of "overwritten", I would give the dialogue in this film as an example. Some of the ideas had potential, but the whole thing was just too awkward. *4/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



I hated this. I'm just going to copy and paste what I've posted with my rating: Interesting topic, but this is beyond low-budget. This is amateur filmmaking. I had read that the production values were pretty low, but didn't expect it to be this bad. Because there is pretty much no talent involved (the acting is terrible), this feels like an "educational" video, a tool designed to teach us an important message. Very noble, but it's not cinema. *3/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



Not bad. Again, I'm just going to copy and paste my previous review:      

Although rather predictable (more than halfway through the film, they reveal something as if it was a big twist, but I had figured it out about 3 minutes into the film), there's still a lot to hold one's attention here. I disagree with assertions that the kids are not good actors; they seemed to be doing a pretty decent job to me. The movie is also interestingly filmed, the director making it a point to never show the two boyx in the same frame. This very unusual choice is at times a bit distracting, but does help to create an unsettling atmosphere. *7/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Again, copy and paste: I don't understand why this movie is so highly rated. There's something seriously wrong with the pacing of this film. The scenes are too short and rely on music too much. The director can't resist going for self-agrandizing shots (beautiful sunsets, purple clouds, amazing landscapes) that in the context and because of their overuse end up feeling trite and superfluous. The acting and dialogue are average at best, and the story is boring, predictable and clich�-ridden - too much symmetry, too much symbolism, too many important revelations that feel empty and meaningless.

I would have given the film 4/10, but Bobo's cuteness is worth an extra star at least. *5/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Previous thread: (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

This was an excellent movie. Much darker than Pelle the Conqueror (by the same director). I think this is a better movie, although Pelle gets extra points for featuring one of the most beautiful boys ever caught onscreen. The performances in both films are amazing, but Zappa is much more tragic and disturbing. Recommended. *8/10*

--------------------------------------------------------------------------



(You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

Previous thread: (You need to Login or Register to view media files and links)

In spite of the subject matter, I didn't have very high hopes for this one. But I was very pleasantly surprised by the quality of the film, in particular the excellent screenplay and the acting. I'm still mulling over some of the implications of the film, and I may post a more elaborate review sometime in the future. All I can say for now is that this is highly recommended to everyone here. It's easily my favourite movie of the month. *9/10*
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TheSwede
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Tack ska du ha.

Posts: 1,069
Location: USA
Joined: 18. Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #1 - 03. Apr 2007 at 13:23
Print Post  
Wow, thanks for the recap JK!  I get so out of touch sometimes...

anyway, now I have a few new movies to add to my list. The last one does look intriguing, too, and the snapshot of the boy is wonderful.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
YoungArthur
BA Moderator
*****
Offline


Hagrid's Helper

Posts: 1,914
Joined: 09. May 2003
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #2 - 03. Apr 2007 at 14:19
Print Post  
I've seen The Proud Rebel, The Other, and Around The Bend. I liked the first 2 and had reservations about ATB, though I rated it higher than yourself. My low ratings tend to be higher than yours.  Smiley

As I remember it, The Other as a novel was about 5 times more powerful than the movie.

Right now I am working my way through The Tomorrow People series, looking for nuggets.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
josephk
Platinum Member
*****
Offline



Posts: 3,981
Location: Canada
Joined: 01. Apr 2002
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #3 - 03. Apr 2007 at 19:38
Print Post  
I rented the first DVD of The Tomorrow People series some months ago and didn't like it enough to continue with the rest. Does it ever get better? I found it hard to deal with the extremely low production values and mediocre acting.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cal-Q-L8
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Admin

Posts: 8,002
Location: Australia
Joined: 30. Oct 2001
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #4 - 03. Apr 2007 at 23:42
Print Post  
'A Whole New Thing' is the standout among that lot IMO mainly because of it's brave and generally non judgemental story line and Aaron Webber was pretty good in what is really quite a courageous role for a kid that age.

My favourite boyactor in those movies is easily David Ladd.

I think you were very tough on 'Around the Bend'   Sad

Oh and I agree with your assessment of the Tomorrow People.  It was a fairly pedestrian low budget show that failed to ignite my interest. I'm amazed that it was so popular.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
YoungArthur
BA Moderator
*****
Offline


Hagrid's Helper

Posts: 1,914
Joined: 09. May 2003
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #5 - 03. Apr 2007 at 23:48
Print Post  
I've been through three DVDs of episodes and no, it doesn't get any better with respect to acting and production values, so far. What has kept me interested is a cute youngster named Peter Vaughan-Clarke whose character name is Stephen.

Actually I've gotten a few laughs out of costuming for the bad guys, some of which look like leftovers from a medieval or Edwardian romance.  Grin
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cal-Q-L8
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Admin

Posts: 8,002
Location: Australia
Joined: 30. Oct 2001
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #6 - 04. Apr 2007 at 04:05
Print Post  
How old is Peter Vaughan-Clarke in the series...

we have him on the cast list but he's not highlighted as a boy actor.

  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TheSwede
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Tack ska du ha.

Posts: 1,069
Location: USA
Joined: 18. Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #7 - 04. Apr 2007 at 04:15
Print Post  
I don't think Peter Vaughan-Clark is a young boy actor in this series, and I have never seen the series, but from Wiki,

Peter Vaughan-Clarke is a British actor, born in Wandsworth, London on 16 June 1957.

that would make him 16 at least, in 1973 when the series aired.  Of course, he would have been a bit younger when it was initially filmed.
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cal-Q-L8
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Admin

Posts: 8,002
Location: Australia
Joined: 30. Oct 2001
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #8 - 04. Apr 2007 at 05:26
Print Post  
Ah ok thanks, that's obviously why I didn't have him highlighted.  Smiley.

YA is excused (due to dotage) for mentioning an actor that has 'passed on' in evolutionary terms
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
YoungArthur
BA Moderator
*****
Offline


Hagrid's Helper

Posts: 1,914
Joined: 09. May 2003
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #9 - 04. Apr 2007 at 16:03
Print Post  
Ok, but he looks and sounds 13 or 14. Nice hair, too.

*Arrr, you young people these days! Harumph*
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
cal-Q-L8
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Admin

Posts: 8,002
Location: Australia
Joined: 30. Oct 2001
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #10 - 05. Apr 2007 at 02:06
Print Post  
It's a treat to be referred to as 'young'  heheh

I'm sure the kids I work with usually think of me as 'ancient'.  They believe me when I tell that that when I was a kid we had to hunt for our food with spears and schools hadn't been invented.  Roll Eyes
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
TheSwede
Platinum Member
*****
Offline


Tack ska du ha.

Posts: 1,069
Location: USA
Joined: 18. Sep 2006
Gender: Male
Re: Seen in March...
Reply #11 - 05. Apr 2007 at 08:17
Print Post  
well, (looking) 12-14 is my favorite age group, so I guess I better try to take a look... do you have any caps of him?
  
Back to top
 
IP Logged
 
Page Index Toggle Pages: 1
Print